<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nurussaniah Nurussaniah</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Punaji Setyosari</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dedi Kuswandi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saida Ulfa</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF AN ANALYTICAL SKILLS TEST IN PHYSICS USING THE RASCH MODEL</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">analytical skills</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bloom’s taxonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">physics assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psychometric validation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rasch model</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The accurate assessment of analytical thinking in physics, particularly in magnetism, poses substantial challenges due to the limitations of conventional tools in measuring higher-order cognitive skills. This study aimed to validate an analytical skills test in physics, based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, with an emphasis on the dimensions of differentiating, organizing, and attributing within the subject of magnetism. The assessment instrument, comprising 15 multiple-choice items, was administered to a sample of 84 twelfth-grade students. A psychometric evaluation was conducted utilizing the Rasch Model, which included analyses of item fit, reliability, unidimensionality, and gender fairness through Differential Item Functioning (DIF). The results indicated strong internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .91, and high item reliability at .94. Furthermore, the item-person distribution showed a well-aligned outcome. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed the unidimensionality of the test, while the DIF analysis revealed several items exhibiting gender-related response patterns, thereby suggesting a need for refinement to achieve fairness. The findings endorse the application of this validated instrument for assessing higher-order analytical thinking in the field of physics and highlight the significance of equitable assessment practices within STEM education.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">522-537</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sujiyani Kassiavera</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A. Suparmi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">C. Cari</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sukarmin Sukarmin</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">APPLICATION OF RASCH MODEL IN TWO-TIER TEST FOR ASSESSING CRITICAL THINKING IN PHYSICS EDUCATION</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critical thinking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">item analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">physics education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rasch model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reliability test</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">two-tier test</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1734897520.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The challenge of accurately assessing critical thinking in physics education, particularly on topics like work and energy, remains a key issue for educators. The current study aims to address this challenge by exploring students' critical thinking abilities using two-tier test data analyzed through the Rasch model. Data were collected from students in Bengkulu Province, Sumatra, Indonesia, and analyzed to evaluate item fit, reliability, and students' abilities across various critical thinking dimensions. It was found that the two-tier instrument demonstrated high validity and reliability, with infit and outfit mean square values close to ideal, and strong separation reliability for both participants and items. Further analysis revealed significant variations in students' abilities in aspects of critical thinking, including interpretation, analysis, and self-regulation, indicating the need for more targeted pedagogical interventions. The study concludes that applying the Rasch model to analyze two-tier tests not only enhances understanding of students' critical thinking but also provides a novel approach to developing and implementing evaluation instruments in physics education. These findings contribute to the existing literature by deepening theoretical insights into critical thinking within physics education and offering practical guidance for educators aiming to improve curriculum design and teaching strategies. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1227-1242</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Suwita Suwita</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sulistyo Saputro</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sajidan Sajidan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sutarno Sutarno</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ASSESSING LOWER-SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS: A RASCH MODEL APPROACH</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critical thinking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">educational evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">photosynthesis topic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rasch model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science education</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1734897709.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The current study uses the Rasch Model to measure lower-secondary school students' critical thinking skills on photosynthesis topics. Critical thinking skills are considered essential in science education, but few valid and practical measurement instruments remain. The current study fills the gap by adapting the instrument from the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. A quantitative approach with a survey design was used in the study, involving 467 lower-secondary school students in Klaten, Central Java, Indonesia. Data were analyzed using the Rasch Model to evaluate each item's reliability, validity, level of difficulty, and discrimination ability. The results suggest that the instrument has good validity and reliability, with the inference subscale being the most difficult, while evaluation is the easiest for students to master. The findings provide insights for educators in designing more effective teaching strategies to develop critical thinking skills. The study implies that a valid measurement instrument is obtained and offers new insights into the profile of students' critical thinking skills in science learning to support more effective science teaching in secondary schools, especially on photosynthesis. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1278-1290</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Emrah Hiğde</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ahmet Volkan Yüzüak</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zekiye Merve Öcal</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hilal Aktamış</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A MANY-FACET RASCH MEASUREMENT APPROACH TO ANALYZE THE PREPARED SCIENCE LABORATORY ACTIVITIES BASED ON SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS AND VIEWS OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">laboratory experiments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rasch model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science activities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science education</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1724480106.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Many-Facet Rasch model is frequently used to analyse and minimize disparities in rater (judge) severity in performance evaluations, in which raters assign scores to test-takers' performances. In this research, the aim of the present study was to analyse science teacher candidates’ laboratory activities by using the Many-facet Rasch model. Rasch model’s surfaces are, respectively: 9 juries, 8 science activities and 24 criteria. The FACETS program was used to do data analysis. Findings show that laboratory activities, which were coded as E8, were found to be the most successful and E2coded activity was found to be the least successful based on the criteria. Jury numbered 7 or coded as G7, is the most lenient, and scorer numbered 5, or coded as G5, is the severest when the juries are listed from the most lenient. The study's objective is to use the Many-Facet Rasch measurement model to analyse laboratory experiments linked to science-related activities. Analysis of the performance of science activities, analysis of criteria hardness, analysis of the severity and leniency of juries, and study of jury bias were carried out concurrently with this goal. At the end of the study, it can be easily inferred that the Multi-Facet Rasch measurement model could be used effectively to evaluate peer groups in science education and objective results could be obtained.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">641-657</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laliyo, L. A. R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">La Kilo, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mardjan Paputungan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wiwin Rewini Kunusa</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lilan Dama</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Citra Panigoro</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RASCH MODELLING TO EVALUATE REASONING DIFFICULTIES, CHANGES OF RESPONSES, AND ITEM MISCONCEPTION PATTERN OF HYDROLYSIS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">hydrolysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">misconception</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rasch model</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reasoning difficulties</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">October/2022</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2022/987-1667236909.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study evaluates the difficulties in concept reasoning, changes in response patterns, and item misconception hydrolysis patterns using Rasch modeling. Data were collected through the development of 30 distractor-based diagnostic test items, measuring ten levels of conceptual reasoning ability in three types of salt hydrolysis compounds: 〖〖Na〗_5 P〗_3 O_10, NaOCl and 〖〖(NH〗_4)〗_2 〖SO〗_4. These 30 written test items were completed by 849 students in Gorontalo, Indonesia. The findings show empirical evidence of the reliability and validity of the measurement. Further analysis found that the students’ reasoning difficulty levels of the concept of saline solutions were varied; the calculation of saline solution’s pH level is the most difficult construct to reason. In particular items, changes in response patterns were found; the misconception curve showed a declining trend and disappeared along with the increase of comprehension along the spectrum of students’ abilities. The item misconceptions pattern was found repeatedly in similar items. This finding strengthens the conclusion that resistant misconceptions potentially tend to cause students' conceptual reasoning difficulties and are difficult to diagnose in conventional ways. This study contributes to developing ways of diagnosing resistant misconceptions and being a reference for teachers and researchers in evaluating students' chemical conceptual reasoning difficulties based on Rasch modeling.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">817-835</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lukman Abdul Rauf Laliyo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Julhim S. Tangio</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bambang Sumintono</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mohamad Jahja</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Citra Panigoro</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ANALYTIC APPROACH OF RESPONSE PATTERN OF DIAGNOSTIC TEST ITEMS IN EVALUATING STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICLE OF MATTER</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conceptual Understanding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">item response</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">particle of matter</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rasch model</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">October/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://oaji.net/articles/2020/987-1602682876.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This research aimed to evaluate the students’ conceptual understanding and to diagnose the students’ preconceptions in elaborating the particle characteristics of matter by development of diagnostic instrument as well as Rasch model response pattern analysis approach. Data were acquired by 25 multiple-choice written test items distributed to 987 students in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Analysis on diagnostic test items response pattern was conducted in three steps: 1) conversion of raw score to a homogenous interval unit and effectiveness analysis of measurement instruments; 2) measurement of disparity of students’ conceptual understanding; and 3) diagnosis of students’ preconception by estimation of item response pattern. The result generated information on the diagnostic and summative measurement on students’ conceptual understanding in elaborating the topic; information also acts as empirical evidence on the measurement’s reliability and validity. Moreover, the result discovered a significant disparity between students’ conceptual understanding based on their educational level. It was found that the distractor item response pattern tended to be consistent, indicating a certain tendency of resistant preconception pattern. The findings are expected to be a recommendation for future researchers and educational practitioners that integrate diagnostic and summative measurement with Rasch model in evaluating conceptual understanding and diagnosing misconception. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">824-841</style></section></record></records></xml>