<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Boris Aberšek</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MORALITY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AI researchers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AI usage</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">computer technologies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning environments</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1734896956.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">One of the important tasks of today’s education is to answer the question of “What are the moral and ethical issues associated with the use of advanced learning systems and modern learning environments, supported by AI methods?” Concrete responses could include the development of a recommendation, regulations and standards (some kind of test), on the basis of which one could assess whether an intelligent accessory (program or algorithm) for learning can ensure the students to acquire all the cognitive, social, and emotional competences, i.e., whether it is ‘safe’ to be used in the educational process. The development of such a &quot;test&quot; could affect the development of various similar ‘security’ tests of AI usage in other areas.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1116-1118</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chang, C. Y.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Johannes-Geert Hagmann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yu-Ta Chien</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chung-Wen Cho</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEVERAGING EDUCATIONAL PATHWAY TO BRIDGE IN-SCHOOL AND OUT-OF-SCHOOL SCIENCE LEARNING: A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">educational pathways</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning environments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">non-formal learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">online learning resources</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">September/2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1419168481.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A short look on any science center or science museum website reveals that significant amounts of online educational resources have been developed in recent years. However, how can the non-formal online learning resources of science centers/museums support learning activities inside schools? This study leverages the educational pathway of energy resources, designed by the European Open Science Resources project and the Deutsches Museum, to develop in-school learning activities. This research explores the impact of different instructional approaches incorporating the educational pathway, including the Self-Guided Educational Pathway (SGEP) and Teacher-Guided Educational Pathway (TGEP), on Taiwanese high-school students’ science learning outcomes. The results indicate that the TGEP approach provides students significantly higher knowledge gains than the SGEP approach. Moreover, the TGEP approach significantly maintained students’ positive attitudes toward science learning, museum learning, and online museum learning than did the SGEP approach. The results are discussed in terms of both pedagogical designs and the social culture of Eastern Asia.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">275-284 </style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bulent Cavas</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">THE USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ICT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">learning environments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">new technologies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science education</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1410008377.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in science education has become widespread and been developed increasingly by many science educators in our digital time. Students’ and teachers’ use of new technologies both in the classrooms and out of school have enhanced science learning more meaningful and permanent. In recent years, new technologies such as scientific visualizations, statistical modeling, real time data collection, dynamic modeling software, and collaborative group work environments has been used widely in science education. However, many researches have showed that the success and effect of these technologies use in the classroom highly depend on teachers’ knowledge, skills and experiences in this area. It is apparent that, in the innovative classroom environments that are designed with ICT tools, the expenditures will be in vain if science teachers have no enough knowledge, skills and experiences in these technologies.
Another important dimension of this discussion is how to guide students to use digital learning environments enhanced with simulations, virtual experiments, and online chatting among their classmates and teachers. These are intended to follow after school time for the sustained understanding of science concepts. In specific, the development of Web 2.0 technologies or social networking technologies provides students with their self driven science learning. These technologies also support to share the visual materials such as photograph, videos, graphics and simulations for a clear understanding of issues that the students may concern. Today's science teachers on the social networking environments do not only discuss with their students science-related issues, but also build and develop social communication skills of their students.
As a result, it should not be thought that ICT tools alone can resolve all the problems of science education. It also should not be assumed that the ICT tools are versatile remedies for students who suffer from understanding of school science. No doubt that a science teacher’s eye contact and social interaction have positive impact on students’ achievement and attitudes in science more than the many technologies developed so far. In the light, science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge to use ICT tools in their science curriculum and the suitable methods to use these tools in classroom atmosphere should be researched in more advanced levels.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Editorial</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">72-72</style></section></record></records></xml>