@article {563,
	title = {FOR HUMANIZATION AND HISTORICISM: HOW WELL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS KNOW AND WHAT THEY THINK ABOUT CHEMICAL EPONYMS},
	journal = {Journal of Baltic Science Education},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2017},
	month = {April/2017},
	pages = {Continuous},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {250-265},
	abstract = {Chemical eponyms possess important didactic and axiological potential that can be utilized for implementation of the principles of humanization and historicism manifested in national educational standards. This study focused on students{\textquoteright} knowledge and views of eponyms in the light of history of science. 22 general chemistry students of Belarusian State University, 131 students of general and 119 students of organic chemistry of University of Oregon, all different majors, were surveyed on their knowledge and views of eponyms using a 24-item online questionnaire. Mann-Whitney coefficients were calculated to establish significant differences and Pearson chi-square test was applied to find correlations. It was found that students{\textquoteright} knowledge and views of eponyms are defined mostly by major: students majoring in teaching chemistry showed higher knowledge and expressed more positive views of eponyms than those majoring in non-teaching, non-chemistry and especially non-science. Other factors include students{\textquoteright} learning experience and study intensiveness. While didactic potential of eponyms is utilized anyway, utilization of their axiological potential depends on instructor{\textquoteright}s willingness and mastery and should not be exaggerated as vehicles for the principles of humanization and historicism.},
	keywords = {chemical education, chemical eponym, historicism, history of science, humanization, named reaction},
	issn = {1648-3898},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.250},
	url = {http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1497156596.pdf},
	author = {Uladzimir Slabin and Vasili Krasitski}
}
