@article {1001,
	title = {A CRITICAL REFLECTION OF BRONFENBRENNER{\textasciiacute}S DEVELOPMENT ECOLOGY MODEL},
	journal = {Problems of Education in the 21st Century},
	volume = {69},
	year = {2016},
	month = {February/2016},
	pages = {Discontinuous},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {22-28},
	abstract = {This analysis is a theory based reflection out of the development ecology. When studying an organisation, transformation and spheres of influence of professions and in education, the Development Ecology model provides a tool for understanding the encounter between societal, organisational and individual dimensions, a continual meeting point where phenomena and actors occur on different levels, including those of the organisation and society at large. However, the theory of development ecology may be questioned for how it looks at the individual{\textquoteright}s role in relation to other actors in order to define and understand the forces underlying the professional development. The focus on the individual might prevent the understanding of group wise development. Resilience capacity on a mental, intra level and an entrepreneurial way of building, developing and keeping networks gives the different levels in the Development Ecology model a broader understanding of what stimulates learning processes. Factors relating to both the inside of the individual and social ties between individuals in a group context in relation to global factors need to be discussed. },
	keywords = {development ecology, organisation, resilience, science education, social ties},
	issn = {1822-7864},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/16.69.22},
	url = {http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=1199720},
	author = {Jonas Christensen}
}
