@article {1657,
	title = {STUDY GROUP SIZE, MOTIVATION AND ENGAGEMENT IN THE DIGITAL ERA},
	journal = {Problems of Education in the 21st Century},
	volume = {81},
	year = {2023},
	month = {June/2023},
	pages = {Continuous},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {361-373},
	abstract = {This study explored the relationship between the size of the study group and the motivation and engagement of students in online and face-to-face classes while exploring the effect of personal and academic background variables, the number of students in the study group, and the level of their motivation to study. The study included 122 participants, students in their second, third, or fourth year of academic studies, who had experienced online studies during Covid-19 as well as face-to-face studies. They had all participated in both small classes (35 students or less) and large classes (more than 35 students). The study indicates that there is indeed a significant difference in students{\textquoteright} motivation and engagement, irrespective of the size of the study group, and the difference in motivation depends on the method of delivery, whether online or traditional (face-to-face). The research results reveal new knowledge regarding online studies and help enrich the literature on this topic, in the context of motivation for online studies and the size of the study group, which are significant causes underlying students{\textquoteright} academic success. It is evident from the study that size does not affect motivation, which is solely the student{\textquoteright}s responsibility. The challenge of academic institutions and lecturers in the digital era is to raise students{\textquoteright} motivation and engagement, irrespective of the study group.},
	keywords = {Covid-19, e-learning motivation, engagement of students, face-to-face classes, higher education},
	issn = {1822-7864},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.361},
	url = {https://oaji.net/articles/2023/457-1687425220.pdf},
	author = {Nitza Davidovitch and Roman Yavich}
}
@article {1562,
	title = {ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT: ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTIONS OF BRAZILIAN MEDICAL STUDENTS},
	journal = {Problems of Education in the 21st Century},
	volume = {80},
	year = {2022},
	month = {June/2022},
	pages = {Continuous},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {426-437},
	abstract = {Academic misconduct during medical school is common, with multifactorial causes, and can negatively impact the training and professional performance of future physicians. This study investigated factors linked to academic misconducts among medical students during their training. It is a transversal, quantitative, and analytical study that assessed the perception of 240 students from five medical courses in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. A virtual, semi-structured, anonymous, self-completed questionnaire was used, with sociodemographic and academic variables recorded. Behavioral patterns were analyzed using hypothetical situations based on medical students{\textquoteright} code of ethics, and the data were compared based on participant and institutional characteristics. Results showed that medical students reported that ethical attitudes were maintained during graduation (98.3\%) and the majority claimed to know the student code of ethics (89.2\%). However, there was a high frequency of academic misconduct, especially "recording classes without authorization" (72.9\%), "cheating on tests" (67.9\%) and " improperly sign attendance lists" (65.0\%). We observed a higher association of females with actions such as "cheating on exams" and taking "pictures with anatomical parts and dummies". In addition, posting pictures with patients and taking on duty without medical supervision occurred more frequently among students from private schools. Although the students considered themselves to be ethical, a high frequency of inappropriate behavior in academic situations was evidenced. This scenario points to the need for greater attention to training based on moral and ethical commitment in academic activities, with a view to future professional performance.},
	keywords = {cross-sectional studies, higher education, medical education, medical ethics, Medical Students},
	issn = {1822-7864},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.426},
	url = {https://oaji.net/articles/2022/457-1657803448.pdf},
	author = {Ingrid Dorea-Bandeira and Oliveira, V. and Mariana Ara{\'u}jo-Pereira and Bruno Bezerril Andrade and Andr{\'e} Nogueira Nazar and Luiz Fernando Quintanilha and Katia de Miranda Avena}
}
@article {677,
	title = {A CASE STUDY OF "HABITUS" AND "FIELD": THE CHINESE RURAL STUDENTS ON THE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS},
	journal = {Problems of Education in the 21st Century},
	volume = {40},
	year = {2012},
	month = {March/2012},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {45-64},
	abstract = {This research focuses its inquiry on the economic aspect of rural university students{\textquoteright} life in China, but the discussion goes beyond the economic field. Massification in the Chinese higher education system has increased the chance for rural youths to receive tertiary education. However, there is rarely sufficient data to record their status quo on the campus. This research intends to fill up the gap by making a comparison between the rural students who are located at different levels in the higher education system. This comparative analysis eventually leads to such findings: Those at the higher extreme of the hierarchy, who have more subsidies, tend to experience more frustration under financial pressure than those at the lower extreme, who are insufficiently funded. Presumably, the former are more directly exposed to rural-urban disparity. While the latter experience less frustration, they are less prepared to impacts from the unfamiliar urban society. The research, eventually going beyond the economic problems, has exposed a process in which the rural youths are victimized by the system that discriminates against the Chinese peasants, in which the higher education system plays a critical role.},
	keywords = {higher education, inequality, rural students},
	issn = {1822-7864},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/12.40.45},
	url = {http://oaji.net/articles/2014/457-1408531978.pdf},
	author = {Jingyi   Dong}
}
@article {532,
	title = {MYTHS IN THE ACADEME {\textendash} PRE-ENROLLMENT PROFILES AND ACADEMIC EDUCATION AS KEY TO POST-GRADUATION EMPLOYMENT AND SATISFACTION},
	journal = {Problems of Education in the 21st Century},
	volume = {29},
	year = {2011},
	month = {May/2011},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {22-34},
	abstract = {Academic education is considered a key to gaining employment and satisfaction. This scientific research attempts to explain the association between the demographic and pre-enrollment profiles of graduates of one academic institution, and their retrospectively reported satisfaction with their academic studies, and with their career. The study, based on a case study of the Ariel University Center of Samaria, Israel, integrates Holland{\textquoteright}s classic congruence theory and Seligman{\textquoteright}s innovative theory of positive psychology, specifically the hypothesis concerning everyday deployment of individual character strengths. Findings of the study demonstrate that deployment of character strengths was a significant predictor of graduates{\textquoteright} work satisfaction. The interesting finding in this exploratory study is the failure of graduates{\textquoteright} pre-enrollment admission profiles to distinguish among graduates based on their post-graduate employment status or job satisfaction. This finding is especially interesting and scientifically significant in the context of the accepted myth in the academe, according to which admission profiles are key predictors of future success. },
	keywords = {academic access, higher education},
	issn = {1822-7864},
	url = {https://oaji.net/articles/2014/457-1405178393.pdf},
	author = {Nitza Davidovitch and Hadassah  Littman-Ovadia and Dan Soen}
}
