US STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN SCIENCE: A REVIEW OF THE FOUR MAJOR SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS

TitleUS STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN SCIENCE: A REVIEW OF THE FOUR MAJOR SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsPoland, S, Plevyak, L
JournalProblems of Education in the 21st Century
Volume64
Start Page53-65
PaginationDiscontinuous
Date PublishedApril/2015
Type of ArticleOriginal article
ISSN1822-7864
Other NumbersICID: 1154014
Keywordsscience assessment, standardized testing, STEM education, Student performance
Abstract

The purpose of this research is to review the nature of four major science assessments administered in the United States: the ACT, PISA, TIMSS, and NAEP. Each assessment provides a very different view into US student performance in science. The TIMSS and PISA are international assessments of student performance and are often cited as evidence that US students are underperforming in comparison to their international peers. The NAEP is used to assess student knowledge of science across multiple age ranges in the United States. Finally, the ACT is administered to college-bound students who elect to take the exam. The underlying philosophies and basic structures of each assessment are explored, and comparisons and contrasts between the assessments are drawn. Historical student performance on each assessment is also analyzed. Analysis of these assessments suggests that US students struggle to apply scientific skills at the high school level, while US middle and elementary students understand scientific content knowledge well.

URLhttp://oaji.net/articles/2015/457-1432232267.pdf
DOI10.33225/pec/15.64.53
Refereed DesignationRefereed
Full Text