<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kharisma Eka Putri</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Punaji Setyosari</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ratna Ekawati</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">INTEGRATING PEER SCAFFOLDING INTO GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING TO ENHANCE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY AND CRITICAL THINKING AMONG PRE-SERVICE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critical thinking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">guided inquiry learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">peer scaffolding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pre-service elementary school teachers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scientific literacy</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August / 2026</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2026/987-1789235491.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Developing scientific literacy and critical thinking is fundamental to contemporary science education. This study explored whether integrating guided inquiry learning with peer scaffolding could improve the scientific literacy and critical thinking of pre-service elementary school teachers. A total of 226 pre-service elementary school teachers enrolled in the Basic Concepts of Elementary Science course participated in this quasi-experimental study using a pretest-posttest control group design. Students in the experimental group engaged in guided inquiry integrated with peer scaffolding, whereas the control group received conventional teaching. Peer scaffolding was systematically incorporated throughout all phases of guided inquiry and was preceded by a pre-peer scaffolding phase involving briefing and concept reinforcement. Scientific literacy and critical thinking were assessed using validated instruments developed from the OECD/PISA framework and Ennis' critical thinking indicators (Cronbach's α = .835). Data were examined using the Mann–Whitney U test, N-gain analysis, and effect size. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher scientific literacy and critical thinking than the control group (p &lt; .001), with N-gain scores of .676 and .773, respectively. The findings indicate that integrating peer scaffolding into guided inquiry is an effective approach for enhancing the scientific literacy and critical thinking of pre-service elementary school teachers.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">695-709</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nurussaniah Nurussaniah</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Punaji Setyosari</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dedi Kuswandi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saida Ulfa</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF AN ANALYTICAL SKILLS TEST IN PHYSICS USING THE RASCH MODEL</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">analytical skills</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bloom’s taxonomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">physics assessment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psychometric validation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rasch model</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The accurate assessment of analytical thinking in physics, particularly in magnetism, poses substantial challenges due to the limitations of conventional tools in measuring higher-order cognitive skills. This study aimed to validate an analytical skills test in physics, based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, with an emphasis on the dimensions of differentiating, organizing, and attributing within the subject of magnetism. The assessment instrument, comprising 15 multiple-choice items, was administered to a sample of 84 twelfth-grade students. A psychometric evaluation was conducted utilizing the Rasch Model, which included analyses of item fit, reliability, unidimensionality, and gender fairness through Differential Item Functioning (DIF). The results indicated strong internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .91, and high item reliability at .94. Furthermore, the item-person distribution showed a well-aligned outcome. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed the unidimensionality of the test, while the DIF analysis revealed several items exhibiting gender-related response patterns, thereby suggesting a need for refinement to achieve fairness. The findings endorse the application of this validated instrument for assessing higher-order analytical thinking in the field of physics and highlight the significance of equitable assessment practices within STEM education.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">522-537</style></section></record></records></xml>