@article {660,
	title = {THE COMPARISON OF OR-IPA TEACHING MODEL AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODEL EFFECTIVENESS TO IMPROVE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF PRE-SERVICE PHYSICS TEACHERS},
	journal = {Journal of Baltic Science Education},
	volume = {17},
	year = {2018},
	month = {April/2018},
	pages = {Continuous},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {300-319},
	abstract = {Critical thinking skills are one of the 21st century skills that are effectively trained by using the OR-IPA and Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model, therefore this research aims to compare the effectiveness of both. Research design used True Experiment with Randomized Subject Control-group Pre-test and Post-test with 94 pre-service physics teachers. Data collected using the critical thinking skills test and the student response sheet, and then analyzed using t-test and N-gain. The results showed: (1) the teaching instruments of OR-IPA and PBL Model have fulfilled the validity requirements (rα ~ .26) and reliability (α = .96 - .99). (2) Each of OR-IPA, PBL, and Conventional Model can significantly increase critical thinking skills at α = 5\%, respectively with average N-gain: medium (.60), medium (.48), and low (.14); with the student response of: very positive, very positive, and less positive. (3) The OR-IPA and PBL Model are effective to improve critical thinking skills, while the Conventional Model is ineffective, and the OR-IPA Model is more effective compared to the PBL Model. Implication of this research is that the OR-IPA Model can be an innovative solution to improve critical thinking skills, but there is still a need for repetitive research like this.},
	keywords = {and PBL model, basic physics, critical thinking skills, OR-IPA model, pre-service physics teachers},
	issn = {1648-3898},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.300},
	url = {http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1523527582.pdf},
	author = {Budi Jatmiko and Binar Kurnia Prahani and Munasir and Z.A. Imam Supardi and Iwan Wicaksono and Nia Erlina and Paken Pandiangan and Rosyid Althaf and Zainuddin}
}
@article {629,
	title = {FEASIBILITY OF CREATIVE EXPLORATION, CREATIVE ELABORATION, CREATIVE MODELING, PRACTICE SCIENTIFIC CREATIVITY, DISCUSSION, REFLECTION (C3PDR) TEACHING MODEL TO IMPROVE STUDENTS{\textquoteright} SCIENTIFIC CREATIVITY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL},
	journal = {Journal of Baltic Science Education},
	volume = {16},
	year = {2017},
	month = {December/2017},
	pages = {Continuous},
	type = {Original article},
	chapter = {1020-1034},
	abstract = {Creative exploration, Creative elaboration, Creative modeling, Practice scientific creativity, Discussion and Reflection (C3PDR) teaching model is a model specifically developed to improve the students{\textquoteright} scientific creativity of junior high school. This research is aimed to analyze the feasibility of C3PDR model in improving the students{\textquoteright} science creativity. The teaching model is considered feasible if it meets the criteria: valid, practical and effective. Ninety-six of the eighth-grade students in Samarinda, Indonesia who attended the science subjects participated in the research during the odd semester in academic year 2015/2016. Its validation was performed by three science education experts through focus group discussions and using validation sheets. The practicality of the model was assessed by 4 teachers using the observation sheets and the effectiveness of the model was determined based on the pre-test post-test of scientific creativity. Scientific creativity measured using Scientific Creativity Structure Model (SCSM) test. The results showed that this model has the content and construct validity in very valid category, practical, and effective with the statistic percentage of agreement R > 85\% and n-gain values = .42, and p < .05. Thus, the C3PDR teaching model is feasible to improve the student{\textquoteright}s scientific creativity of junior high school.},
	keywords = {C3PDR teaching model, feasible, junior high school, scientific creativity},
	issn = {1648-3898},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.1020},
	url = {http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1513971535.pdf},
	author = {Zulkarnaen and Z.A. Imam Supardi and Budi Jatmiko}
}
