<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cunyuan Yang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jiabin Shen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zhe Qian</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">INTEGRATING SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES INTO VOCATIONAL DESIGN EDUCATION: EFFECTS ON STUDENTS’ ETHICS AWARENESS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND DESIGN OUTCOMES</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">design education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ethics awareness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social responsibility</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">socio-scientific issues</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">vocational students</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study explores the effects of embedding Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) into vocational design education on students’ ethics awareness, social responsibility, and design performance. A mixed-methods quasi-experimental design was employed, involving 80 vocational design students divided into an experimental group (SSI-based workshop) and a control group (traditional workshop). Ethics awareness and social responsibility were assessed using the Attitudes toward the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AT-EAI) and the Chinese College Student Personal Responsibility Scale (CCSPRS), respectively. Performance was evaluated using a rubric-based assessment. Qualitative data were obtained from students’ reflective reports. ANCOVA results revealed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in post-test scores of ethics awareness and social responsibility (p &lt; .05). Additionally, they scored significantly higher in ethical sensitivity and user experience, though not in scientific accuracy creativity, or visual expression (p &lt; .05). Thematic analysis indicated that students in the SSI group demonstrated deeper ethical reasoning, increased empathy, and a redefined sense of the designer’s social role. SSI-based teaching not only enhances students’ ethical and civic competencies but also influences how they embed values into design. It highlights the transformative potential of SSI pedagogy in vocational design education.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">434-447</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shen Zhang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CHINESE PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS OF THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pre-service science teachers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quantitative research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social responsibility</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social responsibility of scientists and engineers</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June/2023</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1687108620.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scientific and technological research is important to everyone because their results affect humanity worldwide. Although science and technology bring many benefits to humanity, individuals and societies can face the negative consequences of science and technology. To prevent and solve the negative consequences of research in these fields, it is important to educate scientists and engineers to have social responsibility. However, no research has addressed pre-service science teachers’ views of social responsibility in literature. Therefore, this study aimed to explore Chinese pre-service science teachers' views on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers. The research participants were 194 pre-service science teachers. A social responsibility instrument was administered for data collection. The results showed that participants had high mean scores in five areas of social responsibility and a good awareness of the role of scientists and engineers in addressing problems and risks related to human, environmental, and societal impacts. However, they had lower mean scores in three areas requiring action or involvement. In addition, the results did not show statistical differences by gender or grade level. In light of our findings, we conclude pedagogical and practical implications for teachers and researchers in teaching social responsibility.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">538-548</style></section></record></records></xml>