<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Viet Hai Phung</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thi To Loan Phung</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thi Thanh Huong Nguyen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thi Thanh Phuong Nguyen</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FOSTERING SCIENCE IDENTITY IN SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGH IOT-INTEGRATED EXPERIENTIAL STEM EDUCATION IN AGRICULTURE</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">epistemic friction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IoT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PISA 2025</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science identity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STEM</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April/2026</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=4863028</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science identity, comprising core components such as Science Capital, Epistemic Beliefs, and Environmental Agency, has been identified by PISA 2025 as a key indicator of 21st-century citizen competency. However, contemporary STEM education often lacks effective pedagogical strategies to foster these multifaceted dimensions of science identity in authentic contexts. This study evaluated the impact of an experiential STEM model integrated with Internet of Things (IoT) technology on the development of science identity among secondary school students in Vietnam. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, a quasi-experiment was conducted with 102 eleventh-grade students. The experimental group participated in a 10-week IoT-based agricultural project, while the control group received conventional instruction. Quantitative data were collected using a validated science identity scale and analysed via ANCOVA, supplemented by qualitative insights from student learning journals and interviews. Findings demonstrated that the STEM-IoT model significantly enhanced overall science identity with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.82), with environmental agency showing the strongest gains (d = 0.57). Qualitative analysis revealed that engagement with complex, real-world IoT data generated &quot;epistemic friction,&quot; prompting a shift from simplistic views of scientific knowledge as absolute towards critical inquiry and bolstering students' perceived agency. This study provides a validated measurement instrument and evidence that technology-integrated, contextually grounded STEM pedagogy can effectively advance the competencies emphasized in the PISA 2025 framework.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research article </style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">351-365</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Manassero-Mas, M. A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ortiz Bonnín, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ángel Vázquez-Alonso</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SCIENCE IDENTITY AND SCIENCE CAPITAL: EMPIRICAL MAPPING FROM THE PARTICIPATION IN SCIENCE AT SECONDARY SCHOOLS </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science capital</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science identity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science participation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science-related attitudes</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1746293247.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science identity and science capital (SIC) are theoretical lenses to investigate and explain participation in science. However, their qualitative and sociological orientation may limit their effectiveness in promoting science participation from school science education, so some researchers suggested the importance of mapping SIC. This study empirically develops an educational SIC map after a large sample of Spanish students self-reported their science-related attitudes and experiences on a survey. Three different self-recognitions of science participation serve as the basis for statistically identifying the relevant attitudes and experiences that shape the map. The results reveal a map's core set of relevant traits that are prevalent and common across all three self-recognitions, primarily derived from science classes and interest in science topics. Additionally, there is another minoritarian subset, specific to and consistent with each self-recognition, largely associated with science images, technological topics, and digital technologies. The map’s relevant traits are further linked to the theoretical dimensions of SIC. The discussion highlights the implications of the map for supporting participation in science from school science education and for advancing research in the field. Some limitations arising from the applied survey and future research directions toward SIC assessment and SIC-oriented science education are also addressed.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">326-339</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Juwon Kim</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sungman Lim</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ SCIENCE IDENTITY</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">competent outsider</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q methodology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science identity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scientific literacy</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=4713341</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Understanding the science identity of university students who have completed the national science curriculum is essential, as it provides insight into how formal education shapes their relationship with science. This study examines the forms of science identity among university students, moving beyond insider-oriented definitions that hinge solely on proximity to scientists. In this study, science identity is defined as the self-perception formed through the integration of one’s perceptions of the self, society, and science in scientific contexts. To investigate this construct, we employed Q methodology. From 335 statements generated through literature review and interviews, 42 were selected as the Q sample. Forty university students then completed Q-sorts, resulting in the identification of four distinct science identity types. The science acceptance type recognized the importance of science yet perceived distance from it. The science use type viewed science as a practical tool, with limited concern for ethical or social implications. The science-loving type valued science intrinsically, enjoying inquiry but showing weaker engagement with responsibility. The science responsibility type emphasized addressing environmental and societal challenges through science. By moving beyond an insider-centred view, this study highlights diverse identity forms and their implications for science education.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1169-1188</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jian-Bo Zhu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yu-Zhou Luo</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">THE PREDICTION OF SCIENCE ACHIEVEMENT WITH SCIENCE IDENTITY AND SCIENCE LEARNING SELF-EFFICACY AMONG CHINA’S UPPER-SECONDARY STUDENTS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science Achievement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science identity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science learning self-efficacy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">upper-secondary students</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/987-1713273483.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Science identity, encompassing perceptions of competence, interest, and recognition in science, alongside learning self-efficacy reflecting confidence to master science skills, are key drivers of outcomes. However, developmental patterns likely vary across contexts. Participants were 512 Chinese students spanning grades 1-3 who completed the Science Identity Scale and Science Learning Self-Efficacy Scale, with physics, chemistry, and biology achievement scores gathered. A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model assessed relationships. Results substantiated psychometrics for motivational measures. The model indirectly predicting achievement via first-order discipline-specific paths explained more variance than direct second-order effects. Effects significantly varied across groups stratified by grade and region. Interest and conceptual knowledge drove physics and chemistry success, while higher-order skills enhanced biology achievement overall. However, relationships differed within subgroups, suggesting personalized motivational support needs—self-belief/competence foundations for struggling learners, conceptual development for those with high prior achievement, and intrinsic enrichment for disinterested students. Results detail complex motivational profiles underlying science achievement requiring tailored identity safety and self-efficacy scaffolding alongside conceptual and skill-building for excellence across scientific disciplines. Motivational support systems may spur more equitable and optimal science outcomes among diverse adolescent learners.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">390-410</style></section></record></records></xml>