<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Irwanto Irwanto</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Indah Sari Mukarramah</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Valérie Théric</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patrice Bonnet</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ni Putu Sri Ayuni</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teti Novianti</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Magali Coupaud</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jérémy Castéra</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">THE EFFECT OF IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY ON STUDENTS’ INTEREST AND MOTIVATION IN CHEMISTRY</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">chemistry motivation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">immersive virtual reality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interest in chemistry</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">upper-secondary school students</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">February/2026</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=4765172</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Integrating immersive virtual reality (IVR) into chemistry education offers valuable potential to enhance student engagement through interactive visualisation. However, empirical studies regarding the effect of this new technology on students’ affective factors in school chemistry, particularly in developing countries such as Indonesia, remain limited. This study aimed to explore the effect of IVR on Indonesian upper-secondary school students’ interest and motivation in learning chemistry. Employing a quasi-experimental pretest and posttest non-equivalent control group design, the research involved 68 twelfth-grade students who were divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group, with the experimental group experiencing learning through an IVR app and the control group following conventional teaching methods. The instruments included an interest in chemistry scale and a chemistry motivation scale. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney U tests with a .05 significance level. The results revealed that while both groups demonstrated improvement in their interest and motivation scores, students in the IVR group achieved significantly higher gains. These results highlight that IVR-supported chemistry teaching is a powerful learning tool to foster twelfth-grade students’ interest and motivation, offering valuable implications for integrating immersive VR into science classrooms. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">74-87</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yunus Emre Avcu</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IMMERSION, EXPERIMENTATION, AND OBSERVATION: EFFECTS OF THREE LABORATORY ENVIRONMENTS ON GIFTED STUDENTS’ CHEMICAL CHANGE KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE ATTITUDES</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Baltic Science Education</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">gifted students</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">immersive virtual reality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">observational learning</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">physical laboratory</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">science attitudes</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August / 2026</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2026/987-1789234996.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laboratory environments offer varying degrees of physical interaction, immersion, control, and guidance, yet the impact of these differences on gifted students’ knowledge and attitudes towards science classes and laboratories remains unclear. This study compared the effects of direct immersive virtual reality (IVR), a physical laboratory, and teacher-modelled observational virtual reality on gifted sixth-grade students’ chemical change knowledge and attitudes towards science classes and laboratories. A three-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used with 66 gifted sixth-graders (39 girls, 27 boys). Gifted students learned through direct IVR, a physical laboratory, or observational IVR based on teacher modelling. All groups received the same content, procedures, worksheets, and teaching time. Data were collected using the Chemical Change Knowledge Test and the Attitude toward Science Course and Laboratories Scale, then analysed through a 3 × 2 mixed-design ANOVA. The interaction between learning environment and time was significant for all variables. The physical laboratory group showed greater gains in attitudes towards learning science at school, science self-concept, and overall attitudes towards science. Observational IVR produced knowledge gains comparable to those of the physical laboratory group, but smaller gains in attitudes. Overall, the findings indicate that different laboratory environments support different learning outcomes among gifted sixth-grade students.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">583-599</style></section></record></records></xml>