PUPILS CONNECTING OBSERVATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS IN SUCCESSIVE DEMONSTRATIONS

TitlePUPILS CONNECTING OBSERVATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS IN SUCCESSIVE DEMONSTRATIONS
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsHakkarainen, O, Ahtee, M
JournalJournal of Baltic Science Education
Volume9
Issue3
Start Page167-178
Date PublishedSeptember/2010
Type of ArticleOriginal article
ISSN1648-3898
Other NumbersICID: 925311
KeywordsExplanation, observations, science education, variation theory
Abstract

The aim of this study is to find out how pupils will connect their observa¬tions and explanations from a demonstra¬tion. Seventh graders (117) were shown successively two demonstrations about floating and sinking. Pupils’ observations and explanations were classified and compared with each other in the two demonstrations. The four observation categories were: Complete observation, incomplete observation, non-essential observation, and no observation. The five explanation categories were: Scientific explanation (density), alternative explana¬tion (weight), situational explanation (temperature), spontaneous explanation (irrelevant, insufficient, wrong), and no ex¬planation. Both the observations and the explanations were improved significantly in the second demonstration even that no teaching was done between the demon¬strations. The ways used by the seventh graders in processing their observations and explanations have been examined from the viewpoint of perceptual learning, variation theory, and the memory models in cognitive psychology.

URLhttp://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1405171824.pdf
Refereed DesignationRefereed
Full Text