EVALUATING THREE GRADING METHODS IN MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASSROOMS

Bo Zhang; Jacob Misiak

Error message

Strict warning: Declaration of csl_names::render() should be compatible with csl_rendering_element::render($data, $mode = NULL) in module_load_include() (line 330 of /home/scientia/domains/scientiasocialis.lt/public_html/jbse/includes/module.inc).

Strict warning: Declaration of csl_date::render() should be compatible with csl_rendering_element::render($data, $mode = NULL) in module_load_include() (line 330 of /home/scientia/domains/scientiasocialis.lt/public_html/jbse/includes/module.inc).

Strict warning: Declaration of csl_date_part::render() should be compatible with csl_rendering_element::render($data, $mode = NULL) in module_load_include() (line 330 of /home/scientia/domains/scientiasocialis.lt/public_html/jbse/includes/module.inc).

Strict warning: Declaration of csl_number::render() should be compatible with csl_rendering_element::render($data, $mode = NULL) in module_load_include() (line 330 of /home/scientia/domains/scientiasocialis.lt/public_html/jbse/includes/module.inc).

Strict warning: Declaration of csl_group::render() should be compatible with csl_rendering_element::render($data, $mode = NULL) in module_load_include() (line 330 of /home/scientia/domains/scientiasocialis.lt/public_html/jbse/includes/module.inc).

Strict warning: Declaration of csl_layout::render() should be compatible with csl_rendering_element::render($data, $mode = NULL) in module_load_include() (line 330 of /home/scientia/domains/scientiasocialis.lt/public_html/jbse/includes/module.inc).

Strict warning: Only variables should be passed by reference in theme_biblio_tabular() (line 276 of /home/scientia/domains/scientiasocialis.lt/public_html/jbse/modules/biblio/includes/biblio_theme.inc).

EVALUATING THREE GRADING METHODS IN MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASSROOMS

Title	EVALUATING THREE GRADING METHODS IN MIDDLE SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASSROOMS
Publication Type	Journal Article
Year of Publication	2015
Authors	Zhang, B, Misiak, J
Journal	Journal of Baltic Science Education
Volume	14
Issue	2
Start Page	207–215
Pagination	Continuous
Date Published	April/2015
Type of Article	Original article
ISSN	1648-3898
Other Numbers	ICID: 1151635
Keywords	formative assessment, rubric-based grading, Science Achievement
Abstract	This study aims to fill a gap in middle school science education that no direct comparison has been conducted on three popular grading methods - point based, rubric based, and rubric plus written feedback based - on science achievement and motivation. Participants in this quasi-experimental study are 136 7th and 8th grade students from Midwest USA. Results indicate that for both grades, the written feedback group performs significantly better than the point-based and the rubric-only groups on both achievement and motivation measures. However, science achievement under rubric-based grading but without written feedback is not different from that under the traditional points-based grading, underscoring the important extra power that written feedback delivers. This study recommends that written feedback be highly relevant (to the academic standard being assessed), limited in number (to the major misconceptions students have), and giving a second chance (for students to act on to improve learning).
URL	http://oaji.net/articles/2016/987-1473430856.pdf
DOI	10.33225/jbse/15.14.207
Refereed Designation	Refereed
Full Text