<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Princess Gerbie C. Durante</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ADVANCING CRITICAL LITERACY THROUGH CRITICAL LITERATURE PEDAGOGY-BASED PRINCIPLES OF LITERARY EDUCATION</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">critical language pedagogy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">critical literacy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">critical literature pedagogy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teaching of literature</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">April/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/457-1746640535.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">83</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critical Literature Pedagogy (CLP) is a teaching and assessment approach that promotes reading against the text and critically examining biases, norms, and stereotypes in literature. As literature teachers have limited knowledge of the use of CLP as an educational approach to teaching and assessment of literature, this practical action research explored changes in pre-service English teachers' knowledge of CLP following an educational intervention at a state-operated teacher education college in the Philippines. The quasi-experimental study involved 69 third-year pre-service English language teachers in a teacher education college in Central Luzon, Philippines. Results showed a significant increase in CLP knowledge, with participants' mean scores rising from 2.87 (Knowledgeable) to 3.73 (Very Knowledgeable). The improved CLP knowledge was further analyzed through factor analysis using PCA with a rotated component matrix, identifying four key components for developing CLP-based principles for literary education. Qualitative findings reinforced these results, highlighting CLP’s impact on content and pedagogical knowledge while also revealing challenges related to teachers, students, and administration. Strategies for addressing these barriers were grouped into three categories: Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge. The study’s results provide valuable insights for enhancing practices and curriculum design in literature education.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">196-217</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Princess Gerbie C. Durante</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STRENGTHENING RESEARCH PEDAGOGY: STUDENT’S ONLINE RESEARCH EXPERIENCES, CHALLENGES, AND EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIES</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">online research collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">online research experiences</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">quality education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research pedagogy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sustainable development goals</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/457-1718778585.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">82</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Given the growing trend of delivering classes through online and virtual environments, it is vital to gain a nuanced understanding of students’ online research learning experiences, the factors that contributed to their choice of learning modality, the challenges they encountered, and the effective online research teaching practices and strategies that supported them in completing the course. Although some studies have looked into this area, there is limited literature on research courses conducted online. Thus, this study attempts to fill that gap. Using a mixed-methods approach, the results revealed that overall, there is a significant difference in the projected performance of 204 asynchronous students compared to their actual achievement. Likewise, a significant difference is also evident in the projected performance of the 67 synchronous students compared to their actual achievement. Furthermore, it is of note that the synchronous students projected higher performance and actually attained better marks, with a significant difference in actual achievement compared to their asynchronous counterparts. Analysis of qualitative data also revealed factors that influenced the disparity, including internet connection issues, communication challenges, learning environment, time management, and group dynamics. Additionally, effective teaching practices that facilitated the completion of collaborative research projects include clarity of learning materials, reasonable deadlines, teacher support and understanding, availability for consultation and feedback, and interactive and engaging teaching methods. Consequently, these results can be used to inform and improve research teaching practices, learning materials design, and assessment tool development. More significantly, it may be used as the basis for institutional policies about online research learning. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">341-352</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Princess Gerbie C. Durante</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STRENGTHENING COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PRACTICES IN ACADEMIA: FACTORS, CHALLENGES, AND STRATEGIES</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaborative research writing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research collaboration challenges and strategies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research collaboration factors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">research culture in academia</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2022</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2022/457-1662401156.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">80</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This mixed-method research sought to identify the factors, challenges and strategies that enable and strengthen collaborative research practice in academia. Participants of the study are purposively chosen, self-selected faculty and students from an external campus and a unit in the main campus of a state university in Bulacan, Philippines, who have successfully completed collaborative research writing projects, presented collaborative research projects in conferences and symposia, or published said collaborative research projects. Data were gathered using a researcher developed instrument, validated, and checked for reliability. Analysis of results using principal components analysis led to the development of the DRREAM (Diversity, Role assignment, Relationship-building and peer interdependence, Ergonomic, flexible and adaptable processes, Acquisition of knowledge, skills and expertise, Motivation consideration) model, a conceptual framework on factors that strengthen effectual collaborative research writing; while the use of thematic analysis enabled the formulation of IPP (Individual, Professional and Personal)  model, a conceptual framework on strategies to overcome challenges faced by collaborators in a collaboration research project. Finally, an Action Plan Framework for Effectual Collaborative Research Writing is proposed to promote the culture of collaborative research practices among the members of the academia. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">531-546</style></section></record></records></xml>