<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Serhat Dindaş</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Murat İnce</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ENHANCING PRIMARY STUDENTS’ READING SKILLS THROUGH AUGMENTED REALITY-ENRICHED TURKISH TEXTS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">augmented reality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">educational technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">primary education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reading skills</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">October/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=4664271</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">83</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The present study examined whether the integration of augmented reality (AR) into fourth-grade Turkish reading lessons enhances students’ reading comprehension and motivation. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design was employed, involving 48 students (24 experimental and 24 control) from a public primary school. Students in the experimental group engaged with AR-enriched texts, while the control group read the same texts without AR enhancement. Reading comprehension proficiency and attitudes toward AR were measured using standardized scales, and qualitative interviews were conducted to gather student feedback. Results indicated that the experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in reading skill scores compared to their baseline, while the control group showed no significant progress. A moderate positive correlation was observed between students’ reading comprehension self-efficacy and their attitudes towards AR, indicating that students who felt more confident in their reading skills also tended to view AR-based learning more positively. Qualitative findings further revealed that AR enriched texts increased student engagement—evoking curiosity, excitement, and enjoyment—and helped students maintain focus during reading. These results suggest that integrating AR into reading activities can enhance elementary students’ reading abilities and motivation. These findings highlight the potential of integrating AR into literacy education to foster students’ engagement and comprehension. The study underscores the importance of designing technology-supported reading activities that align with curriculum goals and suggests that AR can serve as an effective educational tool to enhance motivation and learning outcomes in primary education.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">663-676</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Beyzanur Aslan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Murat İnce</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TEACHERS’ CREATIVE THINKING TENDENCIES AND THEIR CREATIVITY-FOSTERING CLASSROOM PRACTICES IN STEM EDUCATION</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creative thinking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">creativity-fostering behaviors</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">professional development</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STEM education</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">teacher characteristics</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=4604138</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">83</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This study examined the link between teachers’ creative thinking tendencies and their creativity-fostering classroom practices in the context of STEM education. Employing a correlational research design, data were collected from 338 in-service teachers actively integrating STEM approaches into their instruction. Two standardized instruments were used: the Marmara Creative Thinking Tendencies Scale and the Creativity-Fostering Teacher Behavior Index. Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses (t-tests and one-way ANOVA) were conducted to examine group differences based on gender, subject area, and participation in training programs. Findings revealed no significant gender or subject-area differences in creative thinking tendencies; however, teachers who had participated in multiple training programs exhibited significantly higher scores. In contrast, female teachers demonstrated significantly higher creativity-fostering behaviors than male teachers, and preschool teachers outperformed ICT teachers in these behaviors. No significant differences were found regarding participation in STEM training programs and creativity-fostering behaviors. The findings underscore the nuanced role of teacher characteristics in promoting creativity within STEM education and suggest implications for professional development and educational design.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">461-479</style></section></record></records></xml>