<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jiayang Liu</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zakiah Mohamad Ashari</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Haihang Zhang</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yilin Jiang</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT AND ITS DIMENSIONS IN RELATION TO ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT: A META-ANALYSIS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">academic achievement</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">academic achievement measurement type</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cultural background</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">economic level</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">meta-analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">perceived social support</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://oaji.net/articles/2023/457-1734858215.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">82</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Undergraduate academic achievement serves as a vital measure of higher education standards. The impact of perceived social support on academic outcomes has gained considerable attention. Nevertheless, existing studies have shown varied results regarding its correlation with undergraduate achievement, and the moderating effects remain unclear. This research utilized a meta-analytic method to comprehensively assess the link between perceived social support, including its subtypes (teacher, peer, and parental support), and undergraduate academic achievement. It further explored how variables like gender, economic level, cultural background and academic achievement measurement type function as moderators. The analysis incorporated 27 studies, resulting in 41 distinct effect sizes across 31,019 undergraduate participants. The results indicated a positive but modest correlation between perceived social support and academic achievement, with teacher support having the strongest effect among subdimensions. Moreover, the moderating effects of contextual and demographic factors on the support-achievement relationship exhibited variations across different subdimensions of perceived social support. This study provides essential empirical evidence about the complex mechanisms linking perceived social support with academic outcomes, offering theoretical and practical guidance for educational policy and future research.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">869-891</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mehmet Ali Yarim</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">THE RELATION BETWEEN JOB SATISFACTION AND PROFESSIONAL BURNOUT IN EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Education in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">aimlessness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">burnout</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">job satisfaction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">meta-analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">professional burnout</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">August/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://oaji.net/articles/2021/457-1628686817.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">79</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Professional burnout is one of the most important problems of working life today. In this research it is aimed to follow the relation between job satisfaction and professional burnout of education workers by using meta-analysis method. In this context, examining the relation between occupational burnout and job satisfaction in educational organizations in Turkey master's theses, articles in Google Scholar by National Thesis Center with his doctoral thesis, EBSCO, ULAKBİM and Dergipark databases scanned, and the number of samples required for the meta-analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient A meta-analysis of 41 (N = 11050) studies containing (r) value was conducted. Effect size values, publication bias, heterogeneity and significance tests results were obtained using the CMA program in the study. In the research study conducted in the random effects model, it was concluded that the p value was less than .05, it took a value between -0.496 - 0.385 lower and upper limits in the 95% confidence interval, and the effect size was at the level of -0.443. </style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">544-553</style></section></record></records></xml>