<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Petro Myasoid</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CONCEPTS OF PUTIN’S BIOGRAPHY: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biography analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">narrative analysis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">psychological approach</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Putin</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">putinism</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">December/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=4751103</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The study presents the findings of research into the biographies of Vladimir Putin written by various authors, employing a narrative analysis of the texts. Cognitive-linguistic structures are identified that reveal the authors’ underlying concepts. Specifically, the concept of the expediency of Putin’s actions by F. Short, the concept of Putin’s identities by F. Hill and C. G. Gaddy, and the concept of Putin's traumatic childhood experience by K. Kurczab-Redlich are examined. The study incorporates data from a broad range of scholars on Putinism. It is noted that Short’s concept serves as a justification for Russia's aggressive policies, with his interpretations of Putin’s life events and political actions closely mirroring the explanations offered by Kremlin ideologists. Hill and Gaddy view Putin’s identities as reflections of Russian history, politics, and culture, regarding the system he has created as a corporation designed to pursue a strategy of revenge. Kurczab-Redlich, on the other hand, highlights the traumatic circumstances of Putin’s childhood, portraying him as a cynical and ruthless individual involved in criminal activities, including bombings of residential buildings, political poisonings, and murders. Each of these concepts excludes certain factors: Short’s theory disregards the historical context of Putin’s actions, Hill and Gaddy’s theory omits psychological factors, and Kurczab-Redlich’s approach overlooks historical and political influences. The article also explores the potential for analyzing Putin’s biography through the lens of the historical psychology theory of prominent Ukrainian scholar Volodymyr Romenets.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">53-63</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tetiana Kononovych</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Petro Myasoid</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PROSPECTS THEORY AND INDIVIDUAL STYLE OF ECONOMIC DECISION-MAKING</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">behavioral economics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cognitive systems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">decision-making style</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">prospects theory</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">single case study</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">June/2020</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=2539640</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Continuous</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The purpose of the research was to test the prospects theory of Nobel Prize winner in economics D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, which describes the heuristics of economic decision-making, to the adoption of a decision by a concrete person. The method of the study is the Single Case Study, which is the most basic form of case-oriented research. The empirical material was obtained using the Melbourne decision-making questionnaire. The presence of cognitive biases in the decision-making process was determined based on the framing effect. Many methods were used to test the decision-making style of the research participant N and the components of intellectual-personal potential determined. It shows that there are deviations in the process of concrete economic decision making, which are not the result of heuristics, characterized by D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. The decision of the research participant is based on the rational style of this process and the analytical system of reasoning. There is an interaction between cognitive systems 1 and 2 with the evident dominance of the latter. This system blocks cognitive biases and ensures the achievement of results. At the same time, there is an influence from the properties of the intellectual-personal potential of the research participant, such as rationality, intolerance to un-certainty, emotional intelligence. In conclusion, the prospects theory explains the decision-making process in the case study, but the &quot;systematic errors&quot; which D. Kahneman and A. Tversky speak about are not observed. Therefore, there is an opportunity to continue studying the role of individuality in economic behavior.</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Original article</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">54-63</style></section></record></records></xml>